Monday, December 20, 2010

Christmas-tide Worship Schedule



SERVICE SCHEDULE FOR CHRISTMAS-TIDE

CHRISTMAS EVE
4.00 PM: Family Service with Children's Pageant
8.30 PM: Musical Prelude
9.00 PM: The Christ Mass

CHRISTMAS DAY
10.00 AM: Holy Eucharist (in chapel)

CHRISTMAS I (26 December)
9.30 AM: Lessons and Carols with Holy Eucharist — ONE SERVICE ONLY

FEAST OF THE HOLY NAME (1 January)
10.00 AM: Holy Eucharist (chapel)

CHRISTMAS II (2 January)
8.00 AM: Holy Eucharist, traditional language
9.00 AM: Family Communion service (chapel)
10.00 AM: Holy Eucharist, contemporary language

FEAST OF THE EPIPHANY (Thursday, 6 January)
6.00 PM: Holy Eucharist (chapel)

Monday, July 12, 2010

Proper 10C


If I were to say simply the words, good Samaritan, I bet most of you could recite the story back to me with all the details. And perhaps, even, if I were to ask you what the gist of the story is, you could come up with some good answers. Were we doing a sermon the base community way (which, by the way, the brothers at Weston Priory in Weston Vermont model), I would stop talking and let the question flow… ‘What is the story of the Good Samaritan about?’ Maybe I should...!

Moses wrote, ‘This law is not beyond your strength or beyond your reach. It is not in heaven. It is not beyond the seas. No, it is very near to you. It is in your mouth, it is in your heart.’

The law of which Moses speaks and which appears in the story of the Good Samaritan is one which Rite One goers hear every Sunday: Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength. Love your neighbor as yourself. The lawyer recites these verses to Jesus when asked what is written in the law? Jesus says he has answered correctly. But there is more to merely answering a question.

And that is what the rest of the story seems to be about. The rest of the story is about what it means to live the answer of loving God and neighbour from within, from the heart, not just from the mind.

Moving from understanding intellectually the law which demands that we care for and love our neighbour to living this law out in our hearts is part of our life-long journey. It is not something we do overnight. But over time we understand what it means to care for our neighbour because doing so is what we are called to do as baptised persons.

It seems strange that a story that would have been so threatening to Jesus’ listeners would have become one of Christianity’s favourites. It seems strange that a story that appears only once in the gospels, in the gospel according to Luke, should so capture people’s imaginations. But it has and, for a multitude of reasons, the story of the Good Samaritan clearly is one of the most well-known and popular stories of the New Testament.

+

A lawyer, otherwise presented as a Torah expert, engages Jesus in a debate. Perhaps the conversation is a test of Jesus’ credibility. Richard Swanson points out that most interpretations of this scene focus on the seeming self-justification of the Torah expert. However, he is not attempting to justify himself. He is attempting to find out how he can be ‘strictly observant’ to the dictates of the Torah. In this sense, a person who is observant, ‘aims his or her whole life so that it adds up to a witness to the stable and orderly love of God.’ Moreover, the lawyer is not seeking to justify himself, he wishes to be justified, that is, to recognise God’s grace as a free gift.

Lastly, Swanson reminds us that this scene takes place between two Jews who are familiar with a Jewish text. In this case, then, ‘be justified,’ ought to be translated as ‘be strictly observant,’ meaning to ‘live a life that is shaped by Torah, a life which points to the goodness of God and to the possibility of safety. ‘For Jewish faith the issue of “justifying himself” does not come up because Jewish faith is, and has always been, quite clear that God’s gracious choice comes first.’ As Swanson succinctly notes, ‘This changes everything.’

In this case, the Torah expert is seeking a proper interpretation, halakha. To do so is a honourable activity and not one of antagonism. So his first question is pretty simple: What do you do to inherit eternal life? Jesus understands that this is an easy question and throws the question back to the Torah expert: What do you find in Torah? The Torah expert answers with the second half of the Shema from Deuteronomy 6: ‘Hear O Israel, You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your strength, with all your mind, with all your soul… and you shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ He has answered correctly. Realising he is dealing with a sharp person, the Torah expert next asks, Who is my neighbour? Now the conversation is morphing into a catechism class or a philosophy class. Obviously the neighbour is someone who lives nearby. But what about those who don’t live nearby but who are still neighbours? So that is where Jesus launches into the story.

Again, remember this conversation takes place between two Jewish characters. The people who walk by the injured man have a ritual obligation to avoid corpse-uncleanliness. They make a conscious choice based on the value system they know. The choice is painful but easy. For the stability of the world, they cannot risk defilement by touching this now unclean, apparently dead man.

Then Jesus inserts a masterful complication: ‘Along comes a Samaritan…,’ referring to yet another unclean collection of people. Surely the Torah master knows he has met his match. When Jesus asks him ‘who was the neighbour?’ he can only answer as he does, ‘the one who showed compassion’. And Jesus can only answer, ‘Go and do likewise’ because in doing, the Torah expert will show himself to be an observant Jew. (1)

Coming then at this gospel with the understanding that the Torah expert was not trying to trap or trick Jesus but was truly trying to understand better how he could live according to God’s desire for stability in the world, the question remains: Who is our neighbour? And how do we respond to our neighbour?

+

The story is not just about showing compassion to the ‘unclean’ and outsider — it is pure and simply about showing compassion. Who has shown compassion? Is it

the priest who befriended people in jail while serving a three-month sentence for civil disobedience for a cause in which he deeply believed

the congregation that reached out to an unknown woman undergoing extreme chemo in a hospital 400 miles away from her home by bringing to the hospital a huge icechest and various containers, proceeding to produce an entire feast for her and the next day bringing over three blankets to keep her warm

the man who stopped on a hot highway to offer a stranded motorist water for her car’s radiator that had boiled over

people who spend a Saturday hosting a community luncheon to those who haven’t had anything to eat for several days

the two who scrambled over the rubble of the collapsed house in Port au Prince the night of January 12th to bring a flashlight to their neighbour because she was outside in the dark on the ground, unable to move because of her injuries

Who has shown compassion? I am sure you can generate your own examples.

+

Hymn 602, Chereponi, otherwise known as ‘Jesu, Jesu,’ a Ghanaian melody from the early 1960s, defines well for us who our neighbour is. In the second verse, the original text says:

Neighbours are rich folk and poor,

neighbours are black, brown and white,

neighbours are nearby and far away.

Then the hymn tells us how we should respond to them:

These are the ones we should serve,

these are the ones we should love.

All are neighbours to us and you.

Finally, the hymn states how we are transformed:

Loving puts us on our knees,

serving us though we are slaves,

This is the way we should live with you.

The chorus reiterates all these themes:

Jesu, Jesu, fill us with your love,

Show us how to serve the neighbours we have in you.
+

The only thing that needs to be added is to remember that we never know when the person we help is Christ in front of us. If we respond to each person as Christ, for each person abides in Christ and Christ in them, then we, too, will find ourselves unexpectedly reaching out to others we never expected… and likewise, being cared for by unexpected people. If we do that, then we will find that the plumb line of compassion in our lives will always hang straight. And in that compassion, we will find the energy and presence of the kingdom of God come near, as we love God and neighbour alike.

END NOTE
(1) Richard W. Swanson, Provoking the Gospel of Luke (Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press, 2006), 162-67.

Proper 9C

Proper 9C • 4 July 2010

Thirty or so miles down the road in little Plymouth, Vermont, a crowd of people is gathering for the annual Fourth of July observance. It wasn’t until after purchasing property just up the road from the historic village that I realised that Calvin Coolidge was born in Plymouth, sworn into the presidency upon the occasion of Warren Harding’s death and ultimately was buried in the Plymouth Notch Cemetery. Nor did I know that his birthday is July 4th (he is the only president to have that birth date) and that every year, the White House sends a wreath to be placed on a deceased president’s grave on his birthday. I learned all these things 18 years ago and whenever I can (i.e., when the Fourth does not land on a Sunday), attend the ceremony.

The noon ceremony is one of those slices of Americana: tourists and locals gather in front of the summer White House and then process the short distance from there across Route 100A to the cemetery. They follow a rag-tag colour guard, mostly Viet Nam vets, though when I first started attending there were some Korean and WWII vets. Members of Vermont’s National Guard also march.

Once across Rte 100A and in front of the cemetery, the participants go up onto the little knoll where one sees four tall gravestones. The only thing that distinguishes Coolidge’s tombstone from the others is the presidential seal etched into the granite. The colour guard stops, and the representative from the Vermont National Guard places the floral wreath on a stand in front of the president’s tomb. In years past, a local member of the clergy would speak… longer than any of us wanted to hear (!), but now the Adjutant General or like person just says a couple of words, containing a good quote from Silent Cal. Up until the late 1990s, John Coolidge, Cooldige’s oldest child, attended; after his death, grandchildren and great grandchildren show up.

At the end of the fifteen-minute ceremony, two buglers play echo taps. Even though I expect that song, every year it brings tears to my eyes. And, yes, even participating in this small slice of Americana reminds me of one of my identities.

+

When the Fourth of July falls on a Sunday, the preacher and liturgist is faced with a conundrum: do we observe the Fourth or do we continue with the Sunday lectionary? I am sort of a ‘strict liturgist’ here; the Sunday lectionary takes precedence over feast days like the Fourth, which is only one of two national holidays that are included in our church calendar (Thanksgiving being the other). Hence, we hear the Sunday readings as they fall in their course. But we have also made note of today through our hymnody and the choral anthem written by the 18th-century US composer, William Billings. You can call it trying to have the best of two worlds.

+

Back to what I said about one of my identities… I don’t dwell on the fact that I am a national of the United States, though I am reminded of it every time I travel outside of the country and have to show my passport, aware of how easy it is for me coming from here, and then as I go about because I look and sound different. I do, however, tend to spend more time thinking about my other major identity, one given to me but one that is not automatic the way my nationality is: that is, a Christian, a follower of Jesus. That identity I have chosen over and over again. That identification is a conscious one. With that identification, comes the responsibility of sharing and there I wonder how well I do it or, for that matter, any of us do. Sharing – in church-speak, the dreaded word of evangelism, which simply comes from the Greek root from which also dervies our word, gospel. As I remind my mother often, evangelism is quite a different entity from evangelical.

+

Luke’s gospel, for the second time, directs us to be evangelists whose message is simple: ‘The kingdom of God is near.’ The first time Luke sends people out, he chooses twelve — the apostles — and gives them power and authority over all demons, to cure diseases, to preach the kingdom of God and to heal. The first go-round in Luke, Jesus tells the disciples, ‘Take nothing for your journey, no staff, nor bag, nor bread, nor money — not even an extra tunic. Whatever house you enter, stay there, and leave from there. Wherever they do not welcome you, as you are leaving that town shake the dust off your feet as a testimony against them.’ Off the twelve go, preaching the gospel and healing everywhere.

A chapter later, Jesus sends out seventy (or seventy-two, depending on the translation used). If we go with seventy, it represents for Israel historically and traditionally the number of nations. Seventy also represents the number of persons involved in translating the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. Most important, it represents the seed and sanction for the continuing evangelism portrayed in Luke’s second book, the Book of Acts.

But something interesting happens in Jesus’ instructions to the seventy. He makes clear it is not the evangelist who barges in, imposing his or her message on someone unsuspecting. It is not the evangelist who holds the power, who holds the person captive. Instead, Jesus states emphatically that it is the evangelist who is a guest in someone else’s space. The evangelist is the one who is received — or not received — by the host. The evangelist is the one who listens first before proclaiming.

Notice also the utter vulnerability of the evangelist. There is nothing of the armed camp of Christendom riding roughshod over the supposed pagans. Instead, the evangelist is stripped down to the bare minimum of possessions — so stripped down that he or she has to rely on the hospitality of the very persons to whom he or she wishes to proclaim the good news of God’s love and salvation through Christ. (1)

This picture of the evangelist is a very different one than the one with which I grew up — you know, the Billy Graham sort, standing in a stadium issuing an altar call for people to come up and accept Jesus as their personal Lord and Saviour. In some ways, that picture is almost too easy.

Perhaps that is why the image that Luke offers — one of utter vulnerability and humility — appeals to me more. The fact that the evangelist is called to respect the cultural traditions and norms of the people in whose space she or he enters, the fact that the evangelist listens, and then proclaims the message of God’s grace, appeal. And buried deep down inside of Luke’s message is also one of reconciliation. This deeper message of reconciliation is perhaps harder to get at since the gospel tells the apostles they are to shake the dust from their feet if they are not received. But that is all they do. They do not shove the message down people’s throats.

Now some may criticise me for not being aggressive enough… for not going out to bring in all the lost souls. Forgive me if my approach does not seem forceful enough. Perhaps there is room for all of us. There are those of us who would rather woo people toward God, just as God woos us to know God. Bear with me as I speak of an evangelistic approach that is non-threatening, non-invasive.

What can evangelism mean?
Nothing extravagant, nothing coercive, nothing invasive.
What can evangelism mean?
Something caring, something gentle, something that will let others know the kingdom of God is near. Something that conveys the message that ‘God loves you.’

Now that’s evangelism! Not a pollyana sort — but witnessing to a deep, down abiding faith that God loves you. And the power to remind gently someone of God’s love for them, too.

A gentle evangelism is like the witness of a Salvadoran woman I once met who told me that when she was shoved by someone on the crowded bus, she didn’t lash out with unkind words as would have been justified. Instead, she remembered her baptismal promise to be a reconciler and kept her mouth shut… already a start.

Indeed, being reconcilers in this world is a powerful form of evangelism and one that I think we can do well. It certainly is part of our baptismal covenant: to carry on Christ’s reconciliation in and to the world.

That reconciliation means that we love those who offend us anyway, regardless of how they treat us because they are also God’s beloved children. Tell others of God’s love for them, with no conditions, no strings attached other than they are already God’s beloved… even if they have wandered far away from God or never knew God. Maybe you have been the recipient of that message, that God loves you anyway and always has.

One of the stories that emerged from the great floods of 1998 concerns an 85 year-old man who was rescued from his swamped trailer up in Bristol. During the whole ordeal of being carried out in EMT personnel’s arms, he kept up a steady stream of bantering. He allowed the press to interview him, joking all the way. He kidded around with the ambulance crew as they took him to the hospital to be checked out. But when all the people left, and the only person standing by him was an EMT, one of my brother priests, the old Vermonter began to cry. In his tears, he said that all he owned was in that trailer. And worse, his cat was somewhere in there, and he was afraid it had drowned. The priest covered up his EMT badge, leaned over and said quietly into the old man’s ear, ‘You know, God loves you.’

That priest is Don Morris, the interim who served here before my arrival. What a gentle but strong example! We all can learn from him and others who are not afraid to speak out of God’s love.

How do you proclaim to others that God loves them? When was the last time you invited someone to come and see, to join you here for church? When was the last time you claimed being an evangelist?

We inhabit many worlds but give thanks to God that we live in a place where we can proclaim our faith without fear and share it with others. So, let’s not squander this gift. Go out and tell others that God loves them. And then bring them here so we can join them on their journey to know this amazing God. It’s all a part of who we are… followers of Jesus.





END NOTE
(1) These paragraphs are based, in part, on an article by Bill Wylie-Kellerman, ‘Singing the Lord’s Song to people and powers’ in The Witness, Vol. 75, No 1, January 1992, 8-10.

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Proper 5C

Out in internet land (where I spend far too much time), a colleague asked about this morning’s readings: How come he didn’t remember ever having preached on them? The answer is simple: depending on when we celebrate Easter determines where we pick up in the lectionary cycle for this long season of Pentecost that stretches from last week through to the end of the month of November. Looking at my preaching records back to 1994, we have not started this early in the third-year cycle of readings. So if you are not particularly familiar with the story of the widow of Zarephath, do not despair!

Since we are going to be spending the rest of the year hearing from the gospel according to Luke, I thought it would be interesting to focus this morning on the story from the First Book of the Kings, since it is probably less familiar. The end of the first book contains stories about the prophets Elijah and Elisha. Herbert O’Driscoll describes the setting thusly: ‘We are in the Israel of nearly a thousand years before the birth of Christ. Life is almost totally rural. Small villages and towns, few and far between, are fortified. The rule of local kings is unpredictable and tends to weigh on the backs of the people. Above all, there is great tension in this region between two kinds of reality, two ways of living, two views of understanding how the universe works. In the language of the time, there is a war between competing gods. These gods have names. One is called Ba’al and the other Yahweh. One is a god of nature; the other is the God of history. To believe in Yahweh is to believe that there cannot be any worship of other gods in one’s life.’(1)

The story we hear this morning begins with a widow who initially feeds Elijah out of her poverty: she only has a little meal and oil. However, she recognises that it is a prophet in her midst so she gives her all to him. God provides abundantly and she, Elijah and her household even eat for many days.

Suddenly, the scene shifts and the woman, having escaped one disaster, famine, now faces another: her son is no longer breathing. She accuses Elijah’s presence for this turn of events: somehow with his staying with her, some unknown sin has been brought to the present and it is on account of this sin that her son has died. Her response is as common now as then: when tragedy strikes, people think that God is punishing them.

Elijah does not defend himself. Instead, he takes the son, lays him on his own bed and goes as far as to ask God if his presence really was the cause behind the child’s death: ‘O Lord my God, have you brought calamity even upon this widow with whom I am staying, by killing her son?’ Elijah questions this theology and shows, through God’s actions, that this theology is bankrupt. He combines prayer and ritual and somehow God hears him and brings the child back to life.

The widow then changes her opinion of the prophet (and God). She utters a confession that witnesses both to the power of the word of God and its mediation through the ‘man of God.’ The activity of both prophet and God bring about the restoration of the son. The story climaxes with the widow’s profession of faith: ‘Now I know that you are a man of God and that the word of the Lord in your mouth is truth.’

+

There are many ways to approach this story but since the whole question of why is there suffering and why it happens to good people is on my mind, I am going with that.

The injustice of snatching a son away from a widow demands comment (insofar as answers to such questions are never readily available). It raises some of the questions people ask God, such as, “Why were we created if this is what happens to us?”

Questions of loss—be it of a child, a dream, a hope—are raised by this portion of the biblical passage. Certainly the sudden illness and possible death of the son seems a cruel turn of events for a woman whose identity is found through him. How many women know the difficulties of the widow of Zeraphath? How many women know what it is like to raise a child single-handedly? How many women know the despair that comes when the well-being of the person or thing dearest to their heart is suddenly threatened?

Oh, the prophet revives her son. This he does, and mother and child are reunited. This is a happy ending to a potentially tragic story, but how does one approach such a story in the context of real life when the prophet does not miraculously appear and bring back to life one’s beloved? How does one speak to that sort of pain which demands answers when one knows that one cannot find them? Like the widow, are we not tempted to say: ‘What have you against me, O man of God?’

+

I think of these questions because in two weeks I will be part of a team who will be spending four days with the clergy and their families of the Episcopal Church of Haiti. During this four-day period, called, Strength for the Journey (Kouraj pou vwayaj la), we will begin to address three main topics: the human condition, life as a journey, healing and moving forward. On the second day, we will discuss briefly questions of theodicy:

Why do bad things happen to good people?
Why do the innocent/children/elderly suffer?
Where is God in all of this?
Does God care about me? Is suffering a test? a punishment?
Where is hope?

Where do you stand on these questions? Do you think God makes people suffer in order to test their faith (that is the Job story)? Do you think God punishes people for their sins by making them suffer? This line of thinking always seems to come to the fore after some disaster — people preached this post 2001-earthquakes in El Salvador, post 2005-Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans and now in Haiti. Do you think God abandons us in our suffering? Do you think God accompanies us in our suffering? How much is suffering part of the human condition, that is, our finitude, the fact that we are mortal? How much of suffering is related to the choices we make? Some of choices can be labelled as sinful insofar as they do not respect God’s creation — be it people, animals or the earth. Where is hope when we are confronted with a disaster of inconceivable proportions?

I am still working on a theology of suffering. My heart has a two-word answer when confronted with suffering: God weeps. Expanded: God weeps with us. The implications of this statement are great: what I am saying is that God does not have utter control over the earth, over what happens on it and to it any more than God has control over us. My statement clearly goes against any concept of predestination, e.g., that the people of Haiti were predestined to suffer such devastating loss and there was nothing they could do about it.

My belief does imply that we human beings do have a lot of options — whether we choose life or death, of ourselves, our families, our societies and our world. This past week, my heart has ached seeing the photographs of the birds that are so gunked up in oil from the Deepwater disaster that they are unrecognisable. The life of a brown pelican or a laughing gull should be as precious as one of ours. And, so, we have to make drastic changes in our way of living. We have to make choices that favour life. I do not think in this example of the disaster happening in the Gulf of Mexico that God is punishing us for sin. We brought this one upon ourselves.

This sort of example is perhaps easier to confront than those where choice does not play into question, such as when an infant dies or when people’s worlds come undone through earthquake, hurricane, flood, or war. We are left with more questions than answers in these moments, with sighs too deep for words.

What I do know in my heart is that God is with us in the tomb. God is with us in the suffering. God is not going to take that suffering away from us, through sometimes that suffering will disappear through reasons we cannot explain which we may well call miraculous. I know in my heart that the accompaniment of others through prayer, communion, tears, talking, and (as contradictory as this might seem to what I have said above) handing over that which I cannot control to God, while taking responsibility for that which I can control, that somehow I can bear some of the suffering that comes my way. And I know that I need the community of faith for prayer and support.

In the bottom of my soul, I know that if I go to the depths of the sea God is there with me, if I go to the heights of the mountains, God is there with me, that wherever I go, God is there.

We may not have a clear answer to the ageless question of why there is suffering but we can pray that God be with us in that uncertainty.

+

Saint Patrick’s words sum it up well:

Christ be with me, Christ within me,
Christ behind me, Christ before me,
Christ beside me, Christ to win me,
Christ to comfort and restore me.
Christ beneath me, Christ above me,
Christ in quiet, Christ in danger,
Christ in hearts of all that love me,
Christ in mouth of friend and stranger. (Hymn 370)

END NOTES
(1) Herbert O'Driscoll, The Word Among Us, Year C, Vol. 3 (Toronto, ONT: Anglican Book Centre, 1998), 16.
(2) Terence E. Fretheim, Proclamation 6: Pentecost 1 (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1997), 28-29.

Trinity Sunday


Jesus asked his disciples, Who do people say that I am? And his disciples answered and said, ‘Some say you are John the Baptist returned from the dead; others say Elias, or other of the old prophets.’ And Jesus answered and said, ‘But who do you say that I am?’

Peter answered and said, ‘You are the Logos, existing in the Father as His rationality and then, by an act of His will, being generated, in consideration of the various functions by which God is related to his creation, but only on the fact that Scripture speaks of a Father, and a Son, and a Holy Spirit, each member of the Trinity being coequal with every other member, and each acting inseparably with and interpenetrating every other member, with only an economic subordination within God, but causing no division which would make the substance no longer simple.’

And Jesus answering, said, ‘What?’

+

This joke that has been circulating this past week on the internet amongst preachers scratching their heads as they prepare their sermon on the Trinity, sums up the difficulty of articulating that which stands at the centre of our faith, the doctrine of the Trinity. It uses all the highfaluting words and images that theologians over the centuries have come up with leaving us with the same response as Jesus, ‘What?’

So I turn to some of my favourite theologians. Even they struggle to articulate this mystery. Leonardo Boff, an eminent Brazilian theologian says quite simply of the Trinity: ‘The Holy Trinity is a sacramental mystery. As sacramental, it can be understood progressively, as the Trinity communicates itself and the understanding heart assimilates it. As mystery, it will always remain the Unknown in all understanding, since the mystery is the Father himself, the Son himself and the Holy Spirit itself. And the mystery will last for all eternity.’ (1)

Nonetheless , I came across a story that can at least give us something to chew on while we love the mystery of the Trinity.

+

A 2000 novel, Chang and Eng by Darin Strauss, can provide a concrete example of the flow of energy, the give-and-take that happens between the three persons of the Trinity who are, at the same time, one.

Chang and Eng, are probably the world’s most famous Siamese or conjoined twins for the simple reason that their lives were exploited from the time they were little boys. Born in Thailand (known as Siam then) in 1811 on a squalid houseboat in the Mekong River, Chang and Eng were initially taken away from their parents to be entertainment for the King of Siam. From there, after a short spell home, they became, for all practical purposes, slaves to a hawker by the name of Hunter who brought them to New York City in the 1830s. When P.T. Barnum expressed interest in their becoming one of his acts, they struck out on their own. Eventually they settled down in Wilkesboro North Carolina and married sisters. The two of them fathered twenty-one children and lived through the Civil War. In 1874 Chang died first, Eng following him several hours later. They were 63.

Throughout the novel, Darin Strauss plays with the ideas of individuality, personhood, autonomy and unity. Most of the time he refers to the five-to-seven-inch cartilaginous bond between the twins as the ‘band.’ Choosing to narrate the book from one twin’s point of view, he uses Eng—the more articulate, more introverted twin to speak about what it is like to live no more than seven inches from his brother.

No one knows how to call the twins. Most of the time they are called the ‘double-boy.’ When people are not calling them the ‘monster,’ they refer to the two as ‘it.’ Chang, in his less-than-perfect English, speaks of the two as, ‘Eng and I is happy.’ In this case, the grammatical mistake doesn’t seem to be so grave. Though people may think they are clumsy, the two are quite graceful. Eng describes one event that happens while they are sailing from Thailand to America:

Chang and I, never out of step, fretted our way through the labyrinth of men and ropes and masts and rails. I could hear my brother almost chuckling through his heavy breathing when suddenly we came to an open hatch in the deck.

What happened next was as natural as birdsong in a North Carolinian wood, but it left the sailors openmouthed, as if we had lifted the very ship in our hands. When conjoined people are running and suddenly there’s nothing underfoot but twenty feet of uninterrupted air, a moment’s disharmony—when one twin hesitates and his brother jumps—could mean death.

But it is different with Chang and me. Our intrinsic appreciation of one another’s body creates a spark in our shared blood that smoothes differences and brings the universe into our own current.

The two of us vaulted together with the grace and harmony of a bounding deer and its reflection in a still pond, clearing the open hatchway in unison and landing safely on the far side to continue our run. A look over our shoulders revealed that our pursuer was standing before the hatch, wheezing and resting his hands on his knees.

As Straus makes clear in the novel, though the two share a stomach, they are fully autonomous. Though they move as one, they are two. Chang’s thoughts are as unknown to Eng as his are to Chang’s. As Eng says early on in the book, ‘Nailing down a personality is as easy as pinning marmalade to a wall’—even when it’s someone to whom one is attached permanently (6). (2)

+

And so it is with the Trinity. We run the risk of falling into two theological traps when we try to speak of the Trinity. The first, which is common in the West, stresses the one nature of God at the expense of the reality of the persons; the second, common in the East, emphasizes the distinct reality of the persons but does not articulate the oneness of God.

How do we speak of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and make sense of it? What do we mean when we say, The three in one and one in three, the holy and undivided Trinity?

Perhaps the honest thing to do is admit that it is a mystery. And perhaps it helps to remember the 14th century Meister Eckhart’s wonderful description of the Trinity: ‘When God laughs at the soul, and the soul laughs back at God, the persons of the Trinity are begotten. To speak in hyperbole, when the Father laughs to the Son, and the Son laughs back to the Father, that laughter gives pleasure, that pleasure gives joy, that joy gives love, and that love gives the persons of the Trinity of which the Holy Spirit is one.’ (3)

One thing is sure—when we come together for eucharist, the Three in One and One in Three are with us and fill our being. As they dance together, their energy flowing from one person to the next, round and round until it is indistinguishable, let our souls be filled with their joy and love, and share in the holy dance.

END NOTES

Leonardo Boff, Trinity and Society (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1988), 237.
Darin Strauss, Chang and Eng (New York: Penguin/Plume, 2000), 160.
Paul S. Fiddes, Participating in God: A Pastoral Doctrine of the Trinity (Knoxville: WJKP, 2000), 12.

Monday, May 24, 2010

Feast of the Pentecost

Seven weeks after the Paschal candle that stands in the centre of the church was blessed and lit for the first time at the Easter Vigil, we gather once again, one last time, around it to celebrate the Feast of the Pentecost. While it is the still the same candle (albeit shorter) and the flame is the same as before, our focus has shifted from the candle representing the light of Christ breaking back into the world after the depth and solemnity of Holy Week to its reminding us today of the gift of the Holy Spirit as the Spirit breaks into our ordinary lives.

Pentecost is a multi-layered feast day. First, it celebrates the Holy Spirit, represented by all the red we have in church. Red, the flames of the Spirit, uncontainable, filling and releasing the faithful at once, as ecstatic dances fill and raise their participants with energy and hope. Spirit… according to Webster’s, it is that which is ‘the animating principle in life; an attitude or principle that pervades thought, stirs one to action; a vigorous, courageous or optimistic attitude; vigorous sense of membership in a group; to encourage; urge on or stir up.’

The Spirit, which flowed over the waters of chaos at the moment of creation; the Spirit, which God breathed into each living creature at the moment of their creation; the Spirit, that animating force that distinguishes the animate from the inanimate, the living from the dead; the Spirit who lives in each one of us and in whom we have our being.

On that fateful day, fifty days after Easter, the Spirit descended upon the disciples, inspiring them individually and collectively to embody the ministry that Jesus had begun. Jesus had already commissioned them with the Holy Spirit on several occasions—first when, on Easter evening, he breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit,’ and again at the moment of the Ascension when he instructed them to spread the gospel to the corners of the earth. But in the moment of linguistic profusion and proclamation, something new took place.

Eugene Peterson interprets the arrival of the Holy Spirit in these images: ‘Without warning, there was a sound like a strong wind, gale force—no one could tell where it came from. It filled the whole building. Then, like wildfire, the Holy Spirit spread through their ranks….’

With the descent of the Spirit on Jesus’ followers, the world changed. The church came into being—a process about which we have heard throughout Easter-tide through the readings from the Book of Acts.

The church began in the passionate blaze of the Spirit, when boundaries of languages and cultures were transcended for a time and all heard the good news in their own language. The consuming fervour of the disciples communicated itself to all who encountered them and allowed for the remarkable spread of the gospel throughout the known world.

So, then, Pentecost also commemorates the birth of the church—symbolised in our church by ‘Everyone’s birthday’ cakes, which delight us all at coffee hour.

+

We always assume that these great feasts, Easter, Ascension Day and Pentecost, were joyous, happy occasions for the disciples, who understood right away what was going on. I can’t help but wonder if the disciples had moments in the headiness of following Jesus and being part of a new movement, when the excitement threatened to overwhelm them, when the pull of the newness and power of Spirit might not have also terrified them.

Their world was changing upside down every time they turned around. First it was the foot washing and the last supper where their master told them they were his friends and he was going to be leaving them. Then there was this bread and wine becoming Christ’s body and blood. What were they to make out of all that? If that weren’t enough, their master’s tomb was empty on the third day… as he had told them it would be. He had risen but then why did he keep appearing to them in this resurrected body? Finally, they watched him ascend into heaven.

You have to give it to the disciples—they may have fallen asleep in the garden but they stuck it out in the days following the resurrection. They may have been terrified but somehow Jesus’ words of peace—as reiterated in the portion from John’s gospel that we hear today—must have given them the strength and courage to persevere in all the craziness of the first days of the church.

+

Have you ever been in on the formation of a group or organisation? The enthusiasm and energy is infectious and the participants find the capacity to put in endless hours getting the project off the ground. It’s when the project enters the maintenance stage that the enthusiasm begins to wane and people realise the long-haul implications. I often think about the early days of organisations we know well, such as Episcopal Relief and Development, formerly known as the Presiding Bishop’s Fund for World Relief. When its founders created it, did they imagine how many generations it would last? Did they create it because the need was there and, God willing, the organisation would survive over time? It has, thanks to three or four generations’ devotion.

Think of how many generations along the church is! Many, many! The Jesus movement has carried on, despite its internal controversies that raged back when and still do. Regardless the short-comings of the people involved in the church, ‘that wonderful and sacred mystery,’ I believe that it will continue on, thanks to the Holy Spirit.

+

We are part of that chain of generations and generations of believers and seekers who make up the church. We may occasionally experience moments of ecstasy but we know that, really, ecstasy is only part of the story. The work of living the gospel depends on the sure, slow, steady, patient work of a life lived with attentiveness, prayer, and action. We may savour the Pentecost moment of ecstasy, being released in the dance of the Spirit, but we live in the demands and joys of steady discipleship.

Steady discipleship is like putting one foot in front of the other, not necessarily knowing where the path leads, but following and creating the path because our faith encourages us to do so. Steady discipleship is showing up and being faithful and being surprised by God when we least expect it. And most important in this day and age, steady discipleship is conveying to those around us that God loves absolutely everyone, and that through this love, we need never be afraid. Instead of living a life of fear, we are called to be a people of hope. Through steady discipleship, we will come to know the peace that passes all understanding, the shalom that Jesus imparts to us.

Those of you who were here last year on Pentecost might remember the presence of the seven candles over by the font. Each candle represents one of the gifts of the Holy Spirit: Strength, knowledge, piety, awe and wonder, counsel, understanding, and wisdom. Think of which gifts are your strongest today and which ones you would like to encourage. And then, as you return from communion, you are invited to light a candle from one of the gifts, praying that the Holy Spirit will infuse your heart in the year to come. The Spirit will bring inspiration and the peace of God which is no peace because God will lead us in ways we cannot yet predict.

With that knowledge, we can pray, Come, o Holy Spirit come. Spirit of God, take away our fear; take our lives and carry them in the wind of your powerful and life-giving energy; take our hearts and set them on fire.

Friday, May 14, 2010

Ascension Day

[This sermon was not preached because there were two small children present so rather than have them suffer through more talking, we did a conversational reflection as we do at the family service on Sundays but here is what would have been said.]

The story of the Ascension forms a bridge from Luke into Acts, from the time of Jesus into the time of the church. Luke is the only gospel writer to distinguish Jesus’ ascension from his resurrection as a separate event.

Luke tells the story twice, at the end of the gospel and then again at the beginning of the Book of Acts. One interesting aspect of the two versions of the Ascension narrative is the chronological conflict between them. In Luke 24 Jesus ascends late on Easter day itself, whereas in Acts 1 his ascension is delayed until ‘forty days’, perhaps as way to remind us of Jesus’ forty-day stay in the wilderness that takes place early on in Luke’s gospel.

Luke is clear in his narration of the Ascension that it not be used as a timetable for speculations for Jesus’ return. In response to questions about chronology, such as the question posed by the disciples today, Jesus answers: It is not for you to know the times or the seasons. Jesus specifically asks the disciples not to try to calculate the date of his return.

Luke also uses this story to mark an end to Jesus’ resurrection stories. (The lectionary has moved us over the past three weeks further and further away from those stories to a more intentional focus on the Holy Spirit, a focus that will culminate on Pentecost Sunday.) No one can hitherto claim to see the risen Jesus in the same way that Mary Magdalene and the disciples saw him. The forty days of Easter appearances are over. Paul, in First Corinthians 15 lists those eyewitnesses as though to say: These people really saw Jesus—no one else can claim that. (Of course Paul leaves women out of his list, and says he is the last person to see Jesus; Luke would disagree with him.)

What matters here is that now the way the church will ‘see’ Jesus is through the Holy Spirit, that motivating, generative, life-giving power that infuses the church, its scriptures, and people.
+
And so, the Ascension is not about Jesus’ absence as some would have it, leaving us looking up in the sky, waiting to see him up there, but about Jesus’ presence in the here and now.

Brazilian theologian Vitor Westhelle says simply that earth is the place to look for Jesus’ presence. Likewise, rather than stand gazing heavenward in a state of suspended animation, we are to be Christ’s disciples and witnesses in Judea, Jerusalem, Samaria and all the ends of the earth.

For Luke, you and I live at the end of the earth, in a place unimagined back then. But the exhortation to make Christ known to others and find Christ in one another still stands all these centuries later. But, o, that seems so large, so hard to do! Where do we begin?

We begin where we are. It is as simple as that. Gandhi said, ‘If you don’t find God in the very next person you meet it is a waste of time looking for God further.’ If we make one step toward God in one another, God will make ten steps toward us.

I remember my spiritual companion back in Princeton telling me that even on the days she was the most weary, she always tried to remember that the next person coming in her office might be Christ. I don’t know how she did it some days but the Holy Spirit sometimes helps us do those things we think we never could do otherwise.

If we are open to the presence of the Holy Spirit, then others might come to see Christ’s love and presence in us. Surely you’ve had what are called ‘airplane conversations’ — those conversations with an utter stranger who reveals things to you that you think no one else has heard beyond their therapist. Sometimes the conversations are off-the-wall, but sometimes the holy pops into them. They don’t always happen on airplanes, they can occur whenever and wherever the heart is open to seeing Christ in the other. I would like to think, at the risk of being presumptuous, that the Holy Spirit is present in that sort of encounter. I know enough that when the Holy Spirit is present, I am touched for a long time.

On this Feast of the Ascension, let us remember that Christ has not left us behind or abandoned us. Christ is still in the midst of us — in one another, in the person next to us. Pray that we can see them and Christ — together, at the same time, here.

Easter 6C

The gospel reading for this morning prepares us for Ascension Day (this coming Thursday), and moves us further away from the bewildering events of Easter morning at the empty tomb to the equally bewildering events of Pentecost (which occurs in two weeks). At the same time, our focus shifts from the second person of the Trinity, Jesus the Son, to the third person, the Holy Spirit… another not so-subtle way of making us begin to think about the Holy Trinity, which we will remember on Sunday 3 June. So as you hear these readings, remember that we are being pointed in some specific directions.

We also have to remember another layer: we tend to hear the Farewell Discourse from the Gospel of John (reintroduced last week) with its promise of the coming of the Counsellor or Paraclete, as discourses given by the risen-and-not-yet-ascended-Christ, as promises given as though it were during the forty days in preparation for the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost. But that it not what is going on here: for John, these words of Jesus are said while Jesus still lived and walked among the disciples and they were said during the last supper, a moment of extreme anguish, a moment standing in between life before the crucifixion and resurrection and life after these world-changing events. In John’s mind, these words look through and beyond the death of Jesus to his glorification that releases the gift of the Holy Spirit. In the early church, even, the fifty days of Easter included the celebration of the gift of the Spirit, not just on the day of Pentecost.

Recall that in the chapter preceding this one, Jesus gives the disciples the following commandment: ‘That you love one another. As I have loved you, you also should love one another.’ This commandment is an important guidepost that Jesus gives the disciples. For, in loving one another, they will love Christ. Jesus continues to say that he abides in God and God in him. By extension, if one loves one’s neighbour, one will meet Christ in that neighbour, and since Christ dwells in our neighbour, we are then joined with Christ. Christ will dwell in us and we in Christ.

So now, Jesus answers a difficult question from Judas (not Iscariot) in which he asks: ‘What has happened that you are going to manifest yourself to us and not to the world?’ This question is what sets off this morning’s gospel passage. Jesus answers beginning with words very familiar to us: If you love me, you will keep my word, my commandments.

What Jesus is really saying here is: If you love me, you will preserve and treasure not only me, but also my essence, my divine being, my connection with God the Father. If you love me, you will be open to the presence of God in and with you. If you love me, the Spirit whom I send will teach you everything you need, and remind you of all I have taught you. If you love me, you will receive my peace.

Remember the gospel from a few weeks ago? Remember that back and forth questioning between Jesus and Peter in which Jesus asks Peter, Do you love me? And Peter answers, Lord, you know I do. Jesus asks Peter a second and a third time, Do you love me? By the third time, Peter is frustrated, even miffed: Of course I do. Why do you keep asking me? Jesus’ response to him: Feed my sheep. Jesus is asking and then entrusting a crucial task to the very one who denied him three times.

We think we are not like Peter. Jesus is our beloved. Why else would we be here? We love Jesus because we know Jesus loves us. Our response is automatic when asked, ‘Do you love Jesus?’: Of course we love Jesus. Ah… but how come, then, Jesus needs to send us a Comforter, the Holy Spirit, who will remind us what to do and how to act? Who or what is this ‘paraclete’ person? And what does it mean to love one another and live within the Spirit of God?

+

First, who is this Comforter? Two examples, totally unrelated, image for me this Spirit of God.

The first is that of a comforting blanket. Now, the world is divided between those who like a lot of blankets on top of themselves at night and those who don’t. I am one of those who love on those minus 20 or 30 degree nights to have three blankets (and three cats) on top of me. It feels comforting, safe, protective, sort of like having that weird heavy lead covering to protect your innards that technicians put on you before your having x-rays.

Years ago, a person said to me after I anointed him pre-surgery, that the sacrament of anointing felt to him like a protective blanket of God’s Spirit enfolding him and that before he went under, it was the last thing of which he thought. I have often remembered that image of the Spirit, the Comforter, that one who makes us feel safe.

The other image of this Spirit is that sixth sense that sometimes pops into our hearts and we write, phone or visit someone or do some other activity without exactly knowing why, but we just do because we feel we must.

Many times I have gotten the sense that I need to go visit someone, phone someone, not tomorrow but today, now. And as happens in these circumstances, the timing was critical — either arriving as the person takes his or her last breath, or calling to find out that she or he needed to hear words of solace and share a prayer. These moments of intersection have happened enough times now that I truly believe that the Spirit, the great prodder and agitator, is at work.

+

The harder piece of the question is how do we live in this Spirit? Frankly, the rest of the year in our lectionary helps us to answer this question so to try to answer it today in one short sermon cannot do justice to the question.

Again, Jesus gives the disciples the following commandment: ‘That you love one another. As I have loved you, you also should love one another.’ It’s not erotic love he’s talking about. It’s not even the love of friendship, really. It’s a greater love: charity, mercy, kindness, a love that does not depend on liking. It’s a harder sort of love to master.

Love — in the sense that Jesus calls us to — is to be present to one another, vulnerable, open, reconciling, faithful and steadfast. Couples in long-term relationships, married or otherwise, know of the ups and downs their love has taken. They know of the struggles when they have come off the mountaintop and are facing daily reality. They know what it is to be present in the worst and best of times. Communities are like that, too.

What does it mean for us to love as Christ has called us to do? If, as the gospel of John suggests, by loving Jesus we keep and treasure Jesus’ essence, Jesus’ connection with God the Creator, then it follows that we also seek Jesus in one another.

Maggie Ross, an Anglican solitary, writes in The Fire of Your Life:

‘I know a Franciscan friar who was fond of saying that after the Eucharist we should genuflect to each other because we are all walking tabernacles. His half-joking perception is true, and not only in the half-hour or so following the Liturgy, for by our baptism we are bearers of the living Word, having passed with Christ through death to life.’1

Martin Luther put it more simply: ‘O God, grant us grace to receive Jesus Christ in every person and to be Jesus Christ to every person.’2

Whether on a daily basis you spiritually genuflect to one another or receive Christ in one another, and to Christ to every person, know that it is the Holy Spirit, God’s comforter, God’s holy agitator, the paraclete, that lives and moves in you, giving you the grace to do far more than you would think possible and to love one another as Christ has loved us.

END NOTES
1 Maggie Ross, The Fire of Your Life (New York, NY: Seabury Books, 2007 [1983, 1992], 40.
2 John Carden, A Procession of Prayers (Harrisburg, PA: Morehouse Publishing, 1998), 305.

Easter 5C

Anyone who has studied French literature has run across Alain Robbe-Grillet’s La Jalousie — Jealousy or Window Blind, depending on how you want to translate the noun. It is a bizarre book with a story-line that loops back around to tell the same snippet of a piece of life over and over again. It’s sort of like listening to certain pieces of music by minimalist composers like John Adams or John Cage that consist of a never-ending loop.

I sometimes feel as though the lectionary does the same thing for us. It presents the same story over and over but seen through slightly different lenses. In this case, we are hearing a loop that encompasses many themes and many fragments of the larger story.

Today’s gospel reading throws us back into Holy Week and John’s description of the last supper. By the time John’s Jesus reaches the last supper, he has done all the signs he was meant to do. Consequently, Jesus seems to orchestrate his last hours. Part of this preparation comes in words in what is known as the ‘Last Supper Discourse,’ which follows Jesus washing the disciples’ feet.

So much of the Last Supper Discourse focuses on the great commandment: ‘If I, your Lord and teacher have washed your feet, you must wash one another’s feet. I give you a new commandment: Love one another as I have loved you. Everyone will know you are my disciples if you have love for one another.’

Central to the theology of the Fourth Gospel and its companion, the First Letter of John, is the theme of God abiding in us and we in God. Loving one another as God loves us becomes our way of manifesting God in the world. The First Letter of John reiterates this idea in its words, ‘God is love, and those who abide in love, abide in God, and God in them.’ Abiding in and remaining in God’s love becomes the central mark of discipleship in John’s thought. Serving one another as disciples, washing one another’s feet, defines us as people of the Way, of Christ.

How can it be, then, that in Jesus’ glorious statement of love, two sharp and dissonant notes strike?

First, Jesus knows — even before instructing the disciples to love one another — that one of them will betray him. Even in the midst of this intimate, intense moment of communion, someone is out of place. Judas’ betrayal is so discordant that the writer of John has to add that Satan enters into Judas at the time of his receiving the morsel of bread as if to say, the action is so heinous, that it cannot come from a human’s soul but from the devil.

The other discordant note sounds in Jesus’ statement, ‘Little children, I am with you only a little while longer. You will look for me… and where I am going, you cannot come.’ Jesus softens this announcement with the term of endearment, ‘Little children,’ but it cannot soften the underlying sense of total abandonment.

This statement then leads us into the following chapter, 14, which begins with Thomas’ poignant question, But, Lord, where are you going? And can we come too? We know well this story because it is one often chosen for the gospel at the burial office. Jesus answers in words that tell Thomas that where he is going, they cannot yet come but that in his father’s house are many rooms and Jesus is going ahead to prepare one for them.

In fact, then, this morning gospel sums up for us with its backward and forward looking what this season of Easter is about. We are more than halfway through it; we only have two more Sundays of Easter before moving to Pentecost.

And, lurking in the back of our mind, should also be the gospel we heard on Easter morning where Mary Magdalene finally recognizes the risen Jesus, drops to his feet, grabs onto them, only to be told by Jesus to let go of him because he has not yet ascended to his father.

In ten days we will observe the feast of the Ascension, hinted at by the suggestion of chapter 14 of the gospel according to John and then by the recollection of the gospel from Easter, John 20.

We hear all these themes and overarching them are this morning’s words that go round and round in a circle:

Now the Son of Man has been glorified and God has been glorified in him. If God has been glorified in him, God will also glorify him in himself, and at once will glorify him.

They are a mouthful!

What John is getting at is simply this (in the words of Jean Vanier):

Jesus is the glory of God; the glory of God is the manifestation of who God is: it is God’s almightiness and love, it is God’s littleness and humility, it is God’s love and deep respect for each one of us. The glory of God is Jesus walking serenely towards the total gift of himself in love.1

Or, as Iranaeus wrote in the second century: The glory of God is the human person fully alive. I have that quotation on a bookshelf in my bedroom so I can see it on a daily basis as a reminder of how to respond to others in my midst. I fail every day all the time to see God in everyone, of course, and I have to pick myself up and keep trying, but in my heart I know that Divine Glory dwells in everyone.

Desmond Tutu writes in God Has A Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time:

The divine shines through material that was thoroughly unpromising, unlikely, improbable. So we were brought to see that no one is untransfigurable, no one is a totally hopeless case. God does not give up on any one of us. It is truly tremendous.

When you go to heaven, you will say to me, should I be there, too, “Gee whiz, man, I didn’t know you were so beautiful.” You will see the divine light that shines through me, and not just this guy with a large nose. All the people you thought were just mere flesh-and-blood humans, with all their physical flaws, will be revealed to you as filled with divine light. We are meant to be godlike; that is why we were created in the image of God. But we really don’t know what God is like except when we get glimpses. When someone is wonderfully generous or compassionate, we do sometimes stand in awe of that person, and that gives us a glimpse of the glory that is God. And if we had the eyes to see, we would look at one another and see the beauty of God, and we would treat each other with appropriate reverence and awe.

Many people ask me what I have learned from all the experiences in my life, and I say unhesitatingly: People are wonderful. It is true. People really are wonderful. This does not mean that people cannot be awful and do real evil. They can. Yet as you begin to see with the eyes of God, you start to realize that people’s anger and hatred and cruelty come from their own pain and suffering. As we begin to see their words and behavior as simply the acting out of their suffering, we can have compassion for them. We no longer feel attacked by them, and we can begin to see the light of God shining in them. And when we begin to look for the light of God in people, an incredible thing happens. We find it more and more in people — all people.2

If Desmond Tutu can find that glory of God in all people, despite the misery which he lived in apartheid South Africa, then surely we can too.

The glory of God is the human person fully alive. When we find the glory of God in another person, then we also see God’s love incarnate and abiding in another person, for God is love, and those who abide in love, abide in God, and God in them.

Then go out and tell everyone — the people who today will sit on our lawn and buy our chicken barbeque, the people with whom you work, your children, your parents, your friedns — that they are God fully alive in them. Tell them. Tell them.

END NOTES
1 Jean Vanier, Drawn into the Mystery of Jesus (Mahway, NJ: Paulist Press, 2004), 250.
2 Desmond Tutu: God Has A Dream: A Vision of Hope for Our Time (New York, NY: Doubleday, 2004), 96-97.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Easter 4C

The psalm and reading from the Book of Revelation are in the ‘top-ten’ of familiar scripture readings to Episcopalians. Though Psalm 23 shows up once every three years in the Sunday lectionary, of all the psalms, it is by far the most well-known and loved psalm. Even those who are non-practising Christians can often recite the psalm by heart because it has been such a part of literary culture and because it probably is the most frequently chosen psalm of the burial office.

Likewise, Chapter 7 from Revelation is bound to sound familiar for the same reason: it is one of the choices for the epistle reading in the burial office and people gravitate often to this reading. Maybe they do so unconsciously, not remembering that it also is the epistle reading for All Saints’ Day.

Clearly these two readings of hope and resurrection belong to the burial office and, more so, to Eastertide. Whether it is the psalmist’s bold proclamation of confidence in God, in the words, ‘Surely your goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever,’ or the words from Revelation that I have often used at the end of a sermon for a burial, ‘They will hunger no more, and thirst no more; the sun will not strike them, nor any scorching heat; for the Lamb at the centre of the throne will be their shepherd, and he will guide them to springs of the water of life, and God will wipe away every tear from their eyes,’ these two readings assure us of the hope of the resurrection.

They also tie together the first and last readings for today, which is always called, ‘Good Shepherd Sunday.’ The first reading from Acts speaks of resurrection with the revival of Dorcas (or Tabitha). And the gospel reading is minimally linked to the Revelation reading through the image of the shepherd.

+

The thematic thread that links all these readings together is one that comes from nowadays and not necessarily when they were written, each at a separate time. Beyond the purported theme of the ‘good shepherd,’ which is drawn from the gospel reading is the theme of the resurrection, the ‘Christian hope.’

The Christian hope, as defined by the catechism is, ‘to live with confidence in newness and fullness of life, and to await the coming of Christ in glory, and the completion of God’s purpose for the world.’

The catechism elaborates on this opening statement with the following Q & A.

What do we mean by heaven…?

By heaven, we mean eternal life in our enjoyment of God….
What do we mean by the resurrection of the body?
We mean that God will raise us from death in the fullness of our being, that we may live with Christ in the communion of the saints.

What is the communion of the saints?

The communion of the saints is the whole family of God, the living and dead, those whom we love and those whom we hurt, bound together in Christ by sacrament, prayer, and praise.

What do we mean by everlasting life?

By everlasting life, we mean a new existence, in which we are united with all the people of God, in the joy of fully knowing and loving God and each other.

What, then, is our assurance as Christians?

Our assurance as Christians is that nothing, not even death, shall separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

With that resounding profession, the catechism ends.

+

Each reading before us today tries in its own way to articulate what the vision of perfectness in God can be.

It’s Tabitha, thought to be dead, being raised from her sickbed.

It’s God providing the psalmist with green pastures, still waters, a revived soul, the comfort of presence when the psalmist walks through the valley of death, the gift of a table, an anointed head and an overflowing cup.

It’s the promise of salvation, being clothed in the white robe of baptism, and being redeemed.

And it is Jesus proclaiming, ‘My sheep hear my voice. I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life, and they will never perish.’

+

How to bring these wonderful theological ideas back down to earth? In the course of parish life over the years, I have had to think a lot of the resurrection as I remember deaths that have happened to family members of people in the congregation and within my extended family. No matter the age of the person who died, a death is wrenching. John Donne said that every person’s death diminished him. His words are true — when a death occurs, there is a tear in the fabric of the universe and for a moment, in that tear, one sees God’s tears. For a moment, the loss of hope seems imminent.

But, as Dr Jerome Groopman, a Jewish oncologist, writes in The Anatomy of Hope, ‘Hope, unlike optimism, is rooted in unalloyed reality.… Hope is the elevating feeling we experience when we see — in the mind’s eye — a path to a better future. Hope acknowledges the significant obstacles and deep pitfalls along that path. True hope has no room for delusion.’1

Whether it is that hope that we hold that all will be well for those who have died and for us someday when our time comes, or even the irrational hope, like a little flower growing out of parched land, such as I have seen in the poorest communities in El Salvador, this sentiment that sees a better future — in the afterlife or in the here and now — is what keeps us going.

You and I live in ‘unalloyed’ or unvarnished reality. We each have stories to tell of hardship, sadness, loss and suffering. We have walked on the twists and turns of life’s pathways and aren’t deluded by false optimism that often characterises our culture’s attitude toward hardship (along the lines of Bobby McFerron’s ‘Don’t worry, be happy’).

However, we have true hope — affirmation of life in the face of death. This hope, therefore, enables us to live with confidence in newness and fullness of life, yea, to live as ‘Easter people in a Good Friday world’ (Barbara Harris).

We can live in hope because we are part of that unbroken chain of witnesses, called the Communion of Saints, that stretches from the beginning of time to now and the unlimited future. As vast as the stars in heaven, you and I are part of that number, those loved by God from before the beginning and bound to God through baptism for ever. There can be only one response to this knowledge: alleluia!

END NOTE
(1) Jerome Groopman, The Anatomy of Hope: How People Prevail in the Face of Illness (New York: Random House, 2004), xiv.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Easter 3C

‘Come and have breakfast.’ Jesus’ words to the tired disciples have to be some of the most tender words in the gospels. How paradoxical that the risen Jesus comes across as most human in one of his post-resurrection appearances that come at the end of the gospel according to John. How paradoxical that the Jesus of this gospel, who seems to have known everything that was happening to him, also has this capacity to be intimate with his disciples whom he has called friends prior to his death.

Anyone who has been the recipient of someone bringing them even a cup of coffee first thing in the morning knows how gentle a gesture this can be. Breaking one’s fast with food brought by someone else can be a powerful moment. Just think of the children who, with help, bring their parents breakfast in bed. It is a sweet gesture.

+

The circumstances surrounding Jesus’ invitation to come eat are vastly different than a simple domestic scene. He and the disciples no longer are in Jerusalem, the site of such violence, but are once again back at Galilee with all the calm the lake has to offer.

The narrative revolves around the act of fishing. Later on in Christianity, the image of the fish became one of the symbols of Jesus — the capitals of the Greek words, ‘Jesus Christ, Son of God, Saviour,’ spell out the word ‘fish’ (ichthys). Post-resurrection events, it would make sense for the disciples to be out fishing, though they have returned to their former and familiar lives along the sea of Tiberius, rather than go out and find more disciples.

So out they go in the night, raising our suspicions because in this gospel, weird conversations, such as that with Nicodemus, take place at night. This night trip yields nothing and in the morning, that time of rebirth and resurrection, the discouraged disciples return to shore. There they meet Jesus whom they do not recognise.

This still-unknown figure addresses them tenderly by calling them little children, using a term that conveys that they are those who do not yet understand; they are not mature in their faith. He tells them where to go fish so they do. Through that action, the disciple who loved Jesus tells Peter, ‘It is the Lord!’ This recognition scene parallels that of Luke’s narrative of the road to Emaus, which we also hear during Easter-tide. Impetuous Peter leaps overboard, as though he is leaping into the waters of baptism. The others, needless to say, do not follow suit.

And then this unknown figure meets them with cooking fish and gently asks them to have breakfast. Again, in the breaking of bread, preceded by the sharing of fish, they finally begin to fathom that this person is their risen saviour, appearing to them now for the third time.

The narrative could easily end at this point. We would think about how we don’t recognise Jesus in our midst and how sometimes we have to be hit on the head to realise he is there right in front of us. But there is a reason why this story continues on.

+

Our English translation renders the dialogue between Jesus and Peter meaningless because it uses the word, ‘love,’ to convey two Greek words. Jesus asks Peter if he loves him more than the others in the sense of sacrificial love. Peter answers with the more common understanding of friendship, saying, yes, of course, I am friendly with you. Peter misses the point in his conversation with Jesus. Jesus is using the language of agape, self-giving love, whereas Peter is using the word, philios, signifying friendship which is more inwardly directed. Despite Peter’s failure to grasp just what Jesus is asking, Jesus nonetheless asks him to feed his sheep, to accept this leadership that Jesus had excercised during his ministry.

+

These threads come together for us as we consider how we live out Jesus’ self-giving love in the context of our friendly love. Likewise, the scene, that of sharing food and eating, provides a framework to think about what these types of love mean for us.

Sara Miles whose book Take This Bread we read during Lent speaks about the connection between Jesus and food. She first had communion, agape, at the age of 46. Having tasted that bread, the bread of life, her world opened up and she started to feed others, first communion and then in a serious of food pantries, the first of which began around the altar in her church. As the pantry grew larger and larger, drawing in more people than all the Sunday services combined, the rector instructed her to enter the number of people attending the pantry into the service register because it was communion of a different kind. What united what happened on Sunday and Friday was the self-giving love of Christ. This type love does not necessarily mean that we like one another — that is of philios. Agape love means we seek and serve Christ, loving our neighbour as ourself. Living agape love invites, demands us to feed God’s people, regardless their station in life.

For three months now, Trinity has offered a lunch to the community. This is not your typical soup kitchen — this is a feast, a real meal! Consider coming for ham and scalloped potatoes, glazed carrots and cake. That was two weeks ago. Or comforting macaroni and cheese. That was last month. The goals of these meals are several: yes, they target a segment of the community who may not have enough to eat during the weekend and for whom this meal can provide a welcome tide-over. They also meet the needs of those who live in places without a proper kitchen. Finally, and this may surprise you, they are meant for us to gather together as companions on the journey. Our lives are united around food, healthy and not healthy, secular and holy. But we eat together and eating is one of the most basic acts that unites us.

We may fear engaging with people who may be different from us (or so we think). They are still God’s beloved children. Christ dwells in them as Christ dwells in us. And breaking bread together whether in here or in Nourse Hall is an action that transcends our wanting to stay on a philios level instead of engaging on the agape level.

+

Yesterday at the consecration of Ian Douglas, the 15th bishop diocesan of the Diocese of Connecticut, the preacher, Archbishop Desmond Tutu in his sermon said, ‘In God there is a unity of all people. God said, “I will draw ALL people to be held in this unbreakable embrace that won’t let us go.”’ He held himself in an embrace. Repeating the word, ‘all,’ over and over again, Tutu described all the different groups of people there are, the opposites, emphasising that God loves ALL. Finally, speaking to the bishop-elect, he said, ‘… [P]lease tell the children of God that each one of them is precious. Each one of them is held in this public embrace, each one of them is a member of God’s family. Tell them that, tell them that. Tell them.’ He ended his sermon this way.

Spreading that news of God’s love to all belongs to you and me, too, not just to a bishop. We all are charged to tell others about God’s unbreakable embrace, that agape Love that died and rose for us so that we might have eternal life. We may do so through lunches, we may through our worship, but please make sure this message goes beyond these walls to a community that so desperately needs to hear it... to a community that is starving.

END NOTES
Exegetical portion from Wes Howard-Brook, Becoming Children of God (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1994), 464-78.
Sara Miles, Take This Bread: A Radical Conversion (NY, NY: Ballentine Books, 2007).

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Easter Day sermon

The women knew the drill. Up early in the morning with ointments to prepare the bodies of the dead. Taking something precious and dear to restore dignity to those who had been executed by the Roman authorities. Perhaps they take nard, that sweet fragrant oil, ready to anoint the bodies. In the other gospels, a group of women go to the tomb to anoint Jesus’ body.

Mary, though, in the gospel of John, does not seem to come prepared with oil. She comes alone, not in the company of women. She walks in the dark of the morning, that vulnerable time of day when the earth is still waking up, when the day’s potential is but a dream. For her, coming to mourn her teacher, Jesus, surely the day holds nothing but sorrow.

And then she sees the great stone rolled back. Maybe she was the Mary who, along with Martha, stood at the stone in front of Lazarus’ tomb a little while earlier. Her sister, Martha, well aware that Lazarus had been dead four days warned Jesus, who was about to roll the stone away, that there would be a stench. So Mary Magdalene, seeing the stone rolled back, must have recoiled instinctively.

But only for a second. She knows. She does not even need to see. And she runs, runs as fast as she can go back to Peter and the other disciples, telling them Jesus’ body is not there. Peter and the other disciple, presumably John, not trusting a woman’s words, run to the tomb, racing one another. They look in, see the linens on the ground, no corpse and believe, though they do not understand exactly what they believe. Then they leave trying to outrun one another.

Mary Magdalene remains, weeping. Her posture of grief ultimately leads her to a revelation the men do not receive in their haste to get back to the others. The second time Mary looks into the tomb, she sees two angels, one sitting where Jesus’ head had been; the other where his feet had been. They ask her why she is weeping. She answers that her teacher’s body is gone. She then turns around and sees Jesus. In her grief, she does not recognise him at first. He asks her the same question, with tenderness: Woman, why are you crying? Her grief blinds her to his identity but she is insistent in her task: I must find Jesus’ body.

Then Jesus calls her by name and she answers, now understanding that she is speaking to the risen Christ. Not only does he restore her identity, but he gives her a new one: that of an apostle, the first apostle to witness to Christ’s resurrection. He tells her to go tell the others he has risen. Then she runs off.

+

As these things take place, new words break out of the silence of Holy Saturday and touch the hearts and the minds of the men and women who have known and loved Jesus. These words are: ‘He has risen, risen indeed.’ They are not shouted from the rooftops or carried around the city on big placards. They are whispered from ear to ear as an intimate message that could be truly heard and understood only by a heart that has been yearning for the coming of the Kingdom and has recognized its first signs in the words and deeds of the man from Nazareth.

All is different and all is same for those who say ‘Yes’ to the news that is whispered through the ages from one end of the world to the other. Trees are still trees, rivers are still rivers, mountains are still mountains, and people in their hearts are still able to choose between love and fear. But all that has been lifted up in the risen body of Jesus and placed at the right hand of God. The prodigal child is placed in the loving embrace of the Father; the little child is put in its mother’s arms; … brothers and sisters invited to the same table. All is the same, and all is made new. As we live our lives with a resurrection faith, our burdens become light burdens and our yokes easy yokes because we have found rest in the gentle and humble heart of Jesus that belongs for all eternity to God.

+

‘Woman, why do you cry? Man, why do you cry? Child, why do you cry?’ The risen Jesus asks that question to each one of us this Easter morning. In his gentle asking, he invites us to let go of what makes us ache, what weighs us down.

There is plenty in this world that causes us to tremble. We watch the continued deterioration and violence in the Middle East, and find ourselves in the seventh year of a ‘war’ with Iraq and Afghanistan that seems to have no end. We know that even five years later the devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina continue to influence heavily the lives of our sisters and brothers in Louisiana and Mississippi. Racism sadly still is alive and well in our country. And then there are the personal burdens that many of us carry with us — family member’s or friend’s precarious health, job insecurity, recent deaths of lovers, dreams and hopes, and even the sense that the weather is pretty weird these days, thank you very much.

There is plenty in this world to make us want to hide, to say ‘no,’ to live in a world of deadened possibilities, to live in a state of fear.

But that is not how we, as people of the resurrection, are called to live. On this Easter morning, we can rejoice, through our tears, that those deaths in our lives have been resurrected with Christ. Jesus calls us by name, dries our tears, and invites us to believe in the God of Hope.

+

Rather than live in a world of ‘no’s, this Easter morning we are invited to say, ‘Yes.’ To say ‘Yes’ is to make a leap of faith, to risk oneself in a new and often scary relationship. Not being quite sure of what we are doing, or where it will lead us, we try on the ‘Yes’. In a world that is so marked by ‘no’s, we are called to say ‘Yes’ to the good news of restoration, reconciliation, and resurrection. Like Mary Magdalene, Jesus calls us to say…

• ‘Yes’ to understanding that part of our identity is a child of God, marked and sealed as Christ’s own through the sacrament of baptism
• ‘Yes’ to proclaiming the gospel, participating in the prayers of the church, seeking and serving Christ.
• ‘Yes’ to recognising Christ in one another
• ‘Yes’ to change, to possibilities, to growth, to new birth.
• ‘Yes‘ — to whatever Christ calls us to do.
• ‘Yes’ to trust in God’s ways, though they are not always clear to us.
• ‘Yes’ to be people of faith, of hope, of the resurrection.

Bishop Barahona of El Salvador in an Easter message wrote:

‘The resurrection is the hope of the Christian community. With the resurrection, Jesus invites us to a project of hope and to change our lives. It is time of the resurrection; the third day has arrived, Easter has arrived. What have we done for our brothers and sisters, for our own lives? What have we done with Jesus’ project? It is time to re-examine ourselves and act so that leaders and the led are filled with hope in order to offer hope in others.’

That is what the resurrection means for us. We have been raised to new life! And that new life resounds with abundant ‘Yes-s’! We, too, like Mary, can run off to proclaim to others how the risen Christ has touched us, wiped away our tears, changed us, and given us hope.

As people of the resurrection, let us be those who raise things that have been cast down; make new things which have grown old; and be those who proclaim out with loud voice, ‘Yes! Christ has risen, the Lord has risen, indeed! Alleluia!’

Great Vigil of Easter sermon

Just yesterday morning during my watch I sat in the chapel by the altar. The sacrament that we blessed on Maundy Thursday, that we later consumed just last night, sat in the middle of the altar, surrounded by seven eight-day votives, and four ten-hour votives. The candles in the short blue holders flickered and, as the two hours went by, went out one by one.

Casting my eyes from my spot in the back pew, I saw the other vestiges of Good Friday, the empty tomb. The most powerful reminder of the death of Jesus lies in the aumbry door left wide open with its white linen interior there for all to see. The votive above the altar no longer has a candle. That space is utterly bare, void of Jesus’ presence. It is heart-breaking.

Save the fans of the heaters turning on and shutting off, the chapel is utterly still. Tomb-like, quiet. Empty. The church even more so with its bare altar, washed clean on Maundy Thursday.

+

Just this morning, a few of us, like the women, came back to the tomb, in the stillness of the morning, in the darkness of the day. We prayed:

O God, Creator of heaven and earth: Grant that, as the crucified body of your dear Son was laid in the tomb and rested on this holy Sabbath, so we may await with him the coming of the third day, and rise with him to newness of life; who now lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever.

And then we said together the second anthem that is prayed at the beginning of the burial office:

In the midst of life we are in death;
from whom can we seek help?
Holy God, Holy and Mighty,
Holy and merciful Savior,
deliver us not into the bitterness of eternal death.

+

And now… we have journeyed a very long way to reach this point wherein we, like the women, stand in front of this empty tomb. We don’t quite know what it means for us. Confronting the mystery of the resurrection should leave us wordless because it doesn’t make sense. How can we be happy about an empty tomb when we want to see our Lord again?

Perhaps putting ourselves back into the place of the women who gathered that first morning at the tomb in the early light of morning might help.

Elizabeth McAllister writes of this moment:

Imagine the feelings of the women. It is a terrible moment, swirling with apathy, betrayal, overwhelming odds, oppression, and senseless suffering. Jesus had promised so much — where is it now? It seems so long ago.

The weight of the powers of this world and their inertia (or worse) forces us to concede that the world can’t be transformed! It is also a bitter journey for these women…. [But] the tomb is sealed shut by a huge boulder. Put there by the authorities to certify Jesus’ death, the stone also serves to ensure the women’s separation from him. They aren’t even granted the presence of his corpse to comfort them in their ritual of mourning. It is the final ignominy.

But then there’s an earthquake, an angel, guards frozen in fear! This is the kairos moment, an aperture of hope that the story might have a future after all. Like the tomb, the story has been reopened.… Is it possible that not even the imperial death grip and sealed barricade could put an end to the journey? They are too frightened to think, too joyful to stand still. What is this all about?

Amazingly, it is an invitation to follow him again. Resume the way. And resume it, knowing what the consequences may be…. From within the old human being, guarded and barricaded and securely sealed, a new person is emerging. (1)

+

We, like the women, face a new future tonight, a future where death cannot hold us, where we are made new. The kingdom of heaven has been prepared for us from all eternity and tonight we get a glimpse of it as we stand by the empty tomb.

As we look into that empty tomb, realising that Christ has risen, where do we find that kairos moment, that moment of hope that has been offered to us? How do we follow Jesus again? Where are we surprised by joy? And how do we proclaim that Christ is risen?

Each of us will find our way and answers to these questions this Easter-tide. Our journey begins anew tonight. Let us proclaim boldly, then, without fear but joyfully, Christ is risen, the Lord is risen indeed — Alleluia.

END NOTE

(1) Megan McKenna, And Morning Came: Scriptures of the Resurrection (Lanham, MD: Sheed and Ward, 2003), 77-78.

Good Friday sermon


On 4 November 1966 Florence, Italy suffered one of its devastating floods — I say ‘one’ because the city has been prone to flooding throughout its history. In this particular case, a low-pressure system had stalled over Italy for six weeks and on 3 November it began to rain… again. In twenty-four hours nearly 19 inches of rain fell on the already-sodden city. (Residents of CT, MA and RI can commiserate.)

At the height of the flooding, water moved at the rate of forty miles per hour at the height of twenty-four feet. At 7.26 a.m., all of Florence’s civic clocks stopped. The resulting 600.000 tons of sludge, muck, oil, sewage and debris, represented in 12 feet of mud, covered the precious art works of the famed city.

A fairly unknown, hitherto ignored piece of art, the 13th-century Cimabue’s Crocifisso, was one of the many victims. The cross hung high in a refectory of the monastery of Santa Croce. One of the priests of the order went into the monastery and saw the ‘Cimbue Crucifix, looming over the waters of the refectory like the creator spirit. Or rather like God reduced to shreds. It was… “in tatters, the flesh ripped off up to the face,” Christ crucified and then drowned.’ (1) Since none of the witnesses are still alive, no one knows really what happened — was the cross attached to the wall or found floating face down in the murky lagoon that now was the refectory? Most say it was still hanging and the moisture was causing the paint to flake off into the murk.

I remember seeing photos of that heavily damaged cross and then watching the progress of its restoration in reports in Life magazine. Somehow, the damage struck me even as a nine year-old. I can’t explain to you why it had that impact on me but it did. More than forty years later, I think one of the visceral reactions I had was that of the restorers taking the cross down from the wall, taking Christ’s body from where it hung and putting it into a tomb of sorts, the place where it would be restored.

Robert Clark in Dark Water, writes: When the restorers saw the cross, attached to the wall with corroded metal, they realised ‘the cross would have to be cut down like a tree.’ The ‘deposition’ ‘took fifteen men and yards of rope to bring the Crocifisso down. Sodden, it weighed over a thousand pounds)…. Cimabue had milled and joined the four-inch thick planks of poplar to be strong, but no one knew how strong….’ They were afraid the cross would collapse under its weight. Life magazine’s David ‘Lees photographed the straining, grimacing men bearing the weight of the cross — itself bearing the weight of the world, Francis would have said — as a fury of labor, of suffering posed against suffering.’ (2)

Perhaps it was the first time that nine-year old had thought about Christ’s death. It was a real-life event, enacted by living people. The cross was no longer an abstract thing but a central element of her Christian faith, even as only a nine-year old can articulate it. How much more understanding thereof has come over the decades? How much has your understanding of the cross increased over time?

+

The crucifixion has long captured the attention of artists — trying to render visually what it means to worship a tortured man. However, it was not actually until the fifth century, a century after the Roman state had discontinued the practise of crucifixion and no one living had witnessed such a horror, that Christians had sufficiently forgotten the shame and horror of it to begin to make pictures of it. By the time they started making pictures, many of the gruesome details of crucifixion had been forgotten and, instead, Christ was depicted as already resurrected. Still, artists over time have struggled to portray an event that is so hard to grasp. But no matter how hard they and we try, how do we enter into the ‘night of the absolute’ (Kierkegaard)?

+

Every year, Good Friday forces us to confront the question about suffering. A servant suffers on behalf of others. A psalmist despairs of being utterly and inexplicably abandoned by God. Jesus is crucified and buried. Such are the lessons for to-day, but underlying all of them is this one question:

Why was it necessary for Christ to suffer on the cross and die in the first place?
Kenneth Leech author of We Preach Christ Crucified, believes that proclamation of the crucified God, the suffering God, is essential to our belief and existence. The cross often speaks to people, even soothes them, and transforms them because they find in the crucified Christ a source of hope. Perhaps that hope comes from an interior knowledge that healing of pain is a process within the heart of God. ‘There must have been a Calvary in the heart of God before it was planted on the hill of Golgotha.’ Indeed, God could have only suffered on the cross because God was already that sort of God, a passionate, suffering God. (3)

The South African theologian, Manas Buthelezi states, ‘Oppressive suffering does not belong to the category of the suffering of Christ on the cross. Christ’s suffering on the cross was redemptive. It was for the sake of others beyond the self. It was suffering which was occasioned by love and the circumstances of the other.… On the cross God transformed the experience of suffering at the hands of unprovoked violence, vengeance and death into a vehicle of divine love and restoration to new life. […]

‘It is a misunderstanding to associate the sufferings of Christ only with Good Friday. His whole life was a life of suffering and bearing other people’s burdens. To care about other people’s problems in addition to your own can be a heavy burden indeed. To care only about yourself and your problems can make life very simple. But once you allow other people’s problems to worry you and to create an impact upon your life, then you end up suffering with them. That is redemptive suffering. When you allow even your own suffering to become a window through which you gain access to the suffering of others, that is vicarious living. This is the meaning of the cross. This is to take up one’s cross and follow Christ.’ (4)

+

Suffering with others, walking with others bearing their burdens, understanding that God suffers, too, that the cross was God’s ultimate suffering — not that God chose to kill God’s only son — those are some of the messages of Good Friday.

We dare to come close to these truths because deep inside, we yearn to know that the cross is not the end of our story any more than the empty grave is. Even as this Good Friday liturgy moves us closer and closer to the grave, we have reminders of hope. And, so, as we come close to the cross, we also come close to that hope — God’s expression of love for us, God’s reconciliation, God’s mercy.

As we come nearer to Jesus’ cross and what it means as an expression of life-giving forgiveness and love, let us become free in this cross, in this dying and in this love. May we find in the cross not an end but a beginning, not something evil but something graceful. May we find there our brother, Jesus, who came to be amongst us, lived with us and died for us.

For on this day called Good, the cross is not the last word. The resurrection is. Even as we face the bleakness of this day, a day when things may be murky as those flood waters in Florence once were, may we hold fast to the confession of our hope without wavering.

End Notes
1 Robert Clark, Dark Water: Flood and Redemption in the City of Masterpieces (NY: Doubleday, 2008), 158-59.
2 Ibid., 169.
(3) Kenneth Leech, We Preach Christ Crucified (Cambridge, MA: Cowley, 1994), 27.
(4) Manas Buthelezi, ‘Violence and the Cross in South Africa Today,’ Journal of Theology for Southern Africa, no 29, December 1979, 51ff. Cited in John de Gtuchy, Cry Justice! (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1986), 204, 206.